Width for the cell was defined as "the suggested width for a cell content in pixels excluding the cell padding." The only element to support padding in those early days was the table cell. On the other hand, the HTML width attribute of an image defined the width of the image itself (inside any border). ![]() The HTML width attribute of a table defined the width of the table including its border. However, it varied depending on the element. The difference in how width is interpreted between the W3C and Internet Explorer box modelsīefore HTML 4 and CSS, very few HTML elements supported both border and padding, so the definition of the width and height of an element was not very contentious. Similarly, the total height of a box equals top-margin + top-border + top-padding + height + bottom-padding + bottom-border + bottom-margin. The total width of a box is therefore left-margin + left-border + left-padding + width + right-padding + right-border + right-margin. Before CSS3, this box model was known as W3C box model, in CSS3, it is known as the content-box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |